Featured Video

Waterfall toad (Oreophrynella macconnelli) leaps from danger. Discovery's Life series.

Funding Board Highlights

Attn: Funders - Post to the funding board with our online form


   Funding Board: click here

Announcements

Seeking photos -Contact us, if you have photos or videos to share. We will feature them in our video library and featured photo section.

Sign up for our newsletter - We profile the latest conservation studies from over 100 journals plus new funding opportunities... straight to your email.

Featured Comments

Jason on Does land conservation affect the local housing supply? The paper does not seem to consider the affect on prices. The prices are more... Mar 3, 2010


Guest on Not all species are created equal (in the eyes of scientific study) Dan that is true if you subscribe to the idea that only top-down... Mar 2, 2010


Eddie on Land conservation not strategically targeting projects to control growth This is not surprising. Much land conservation is... Feb, 26, 2010


markjordahl on When wildlife avoids perfectly good habitat: the perceptual trap Given that many toxins are endocrine disruptors and affect... Feb 24, 2010


Dr Dan on Snakes interrupted: roads causing genetic decline Wow!! This could be appropriate for thousands of species. For example I know... Feb 18, 2010


Michele Deakin on Can animal rights activists and conservationists find comon ground? It would be nice to think that the two groups can find... Jan 26, 2010


Julie on When an invasive species becomes media hype I completely agree. While both non-native Lonicera and Rhamnus have lots of... Oct 29, 2009

Tuesday
12Jan2010

Identifying minimum patch sizes for breeding success in birds 

Golden-cheeked warbler (Dendroica chrysoparia). Image credit, Steve Maslowski.A new study illustrates the importance of understanding the minimum patch size that an at-risk bird needs to reproduce. Jerrod Butcher and fellow researchers from Texas A&M University looked at the effect of habitat patch size on two songbirds in north-central Texas.

For the federally endangered golden-cheeked warbler, they found that birds did not successfully breed in patches smaller than 15-20 hectares indicating that a threshold exists at that size below which the birds do not reproduce. However, the study also found that the warblers established territories in patch sizes as small as 2.9 hectares (the smallest studied) and paired in patches as small as 4.1 hectares.

From a conservation perspective, this study shows that research looking at just the presence-absence of the warblers (or even bird pairings) would substantially underestimate the minimum habitat patch size needed to sustain a viable population.

The researchers also looked at white-eyed vireos, a habitat generalist, and as predicted found no evidence of a minimum patch size threshold for breeding success - the vireos successfully reproduced in patches as small as 4.1 hectares.

One of the benefits of identifying patch size thresholds is that by looking at how different environmental variables change when you cross the threshold, you can get clues on what factors are influencing the bird behavior. In this vein, the researchers looked at two variables along the patch size gradient: 1) brown-headed cowbird parasitism; and 2) abundance of arthropods - the food source for the birds.

However, the researchers found no relationship between either variable and patch size, which means they likely are not explanations for the threshold. So more research is needed to figure out why golden-cheeked warblers do not breed in patches smaller than 15-20 hectares.

This study also raises the issue of whether small patches act as ecological traps for the golden-cheeked warblers resulting in population sinks that further threaten the species. This could occur if small patches are attractive to the warblers leading to numerous small territories where the birds are not able to reproduce. However, the study authors warn against jumping to that conclusion. They write,

"Patches of habitat <20 hectares in area may not be large enough to sustain a viable population of golden-cheeked warbler in the long-term; however, such patches may benefit populations if the patches can sustain breeding pairs in the short term."

Nevertheless, they advise that managers across the distribution range of golden-cheeked warbler be cautious about decreasing vegetation patches below 20 hectares. Similar research on minimum patch-size thresholds for breeding success could be important for the conservation of other at-risk birds.

--Reviewed by Rob Goldstein

Butcher, J., Morrison, M., Ransom, D., Slack, R., & Wilkins, R. (2010). Evidence of a Minimum Patch Size Threshold of Reproductive Success in an Endangered Songbird Journal of Wildlife Management, 74 (1), 133-139 DOI: 10.2193/2008-533

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.