Featured Video

Waterfall toad (Oreophrynella macconnelli) leaps from danger. Discovery's Life series.

Funding Board Highlights

Attn: Funders - Post to the funding board with our online form


   Funding Board: click here

Announcements

Seeking photos -Contact us, if you have photos or videos to share. We will feature them in our video library and featured photo section.

Sign up for our newsletter - We profile the latest conservation studies from over 100 journals plus new funding opportunities... straight to your email.

Featured Comments

Jason on Does land conservation affect the local housing supply? The paper does not seem to consider the affect on prices. The prices are more... Mar 3, 2010


Guest on Not all species are created equal (in the eyes of scientific study) Dan that is true if you subscribe to the idea that only top-down... Mar 2, 2010


Eddie on Land conservation not strategically targeting projects to control growth This is not surprising. Much land conservation is... Feb, 26, 2010


markjordahl on When wildlife avoids perfectly good habitat: the perceptual trap Given that many toxins are endocrine disruptors and affect... Feb 24, 2010


Dr Dan on Snakes interrupted: roads causing genetic decline Wow!! This could be appropriate for thousands of species. For example I know... Feb 18, 2010


Michele Deakin on Can animal rights activists and conservationists find comon ground? It would be nice to think that the two groups can find... Jan 26, 2010


Julie on When an invasive species becomes media hype I completely agree. While both non-native Lonicera and Rhamnus have lots of... Oct 29, 2009

Wednesday
16Dec2009

Can restoration be too small? Negative effects on avian behavior...

Common Tody-flycatcher (Todirostrum cinereum). Image credit, Dario Sanches.Many conservation practitioners operate with a common assumption that all ecosystem restoration is good no mater the size of the project area. A new study in the Journal of Applied Ecology contradicts this notion by showing that when it comes to tropical reforestation and the effect on birds, bigger is better and too small may be bad.

The work by Emily Morrison and fellow researchers is groundbreaking not just because it shows the importance of patch size in restoration but because it looks at animal behavior to reach its conclusions. Most studies evaluate restoration success with birds by looking at metrics like species diversity.

This study though looked at just four birds - cherrie’s tanagers, rufous-capped warbler, common tody-flycatcher and plain wren - and compared their insect foraging behavior across restored forest patches of different sizes.

They found that in the smaller patches the birds attacked insects at a lower rate (i.e fewer attacks per minute) and exerted more effort while foraging (i.e more jumping around). They also found that arthropod density was nearly twice as great in larger reforestations (greater than 3500 square meters) than smaller ones (less than 350 square meters).

Together these results indicate that birds in the smaller patches are having a more difficult time foraging for food which may have negative consequences for their fitness. This in turn may impede restoration success given that birds in the tropics play an important role in a number of ecosystem processes such as pollination and seed dispersal. Interestingly, a more conventional assessment looking at just species diversity likely would not have picked up on this problem.

These results have practical applicability because conservationists - whether in the tropics or elsewhere - are constantly weighing restoration size against project cost. Obviously, much more research is needed to determine how widely these results translate to other settings. In the case of tropical forests the authors recommend,

"Thus, forest restoration efforts using a patch-based planting scheme should consider patch size as an important factor that is likely to affect the quality of the patches as habitat for birds that use woody habitat. We recommend that small patches be avoided and that patches of at least a few thousand square metres be planted when resources are available."  


--Reviewed by Rob Goldstein

Morrison, E., Lindell, C., Holl, K., & Zahawi, R. (2009). Patch size effects on avian foraging behaviour: implications for tropical forest restoration design Journal of Applied Ecology DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01743.x

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.