Featured Video

Vampire squid (Vampyroteuthis infernalis). Credit, Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Inst.

Funding Board Highlights

Attn: Funders - Post to the funding board with our online form


   Funding Board: click here

Announcements

Seeking photos -Contact us, if you have photos or videos to share. We will feature them in our video library and featured photo section.

Sign up for our newsletter - We profile the latest conservation studies from over 100 journals plus new funding opportunities... straight to your email.

Featured Comments

divangou on Is plant diversity beautiful? Interesting article, but I'd be interested to see if the same is true in forested ecosystems. I'm often... Dec 8, 2009


Johnny on Mitigation transforms streams and wetlands In many places mitigation bankers receive credit-lift for returning currently held... Dec 4, 2009


JohnHunt on Does hunting benefit the hunted? The case of cougars...  Washington does not make a distinction between sex when hunting... Nov 8, 2009


jebyrnes on Study finds biodiversity can conflict with wetland function Interesting study.  I do wonder, though, given that the managers... Nov 2, 2009


Jacobus Koens on Evaluating ecotourism in Costa Rica It is indeed very dangerous to put all eggs in a tourism basket as we tried to show in the article... Oct, 30, 2009


Julie on When an invasive species becomes media hype I completely agree. While both non-native Lonicera and Rhamnus have lots of... Oct 29, 2009


Shauna Chai on Do protected areas halt deforestation? The case of Jamaica I dont think that the socioeconomic conditions in Jamaica... Oct 28, 2009

Thursday
12Nov2009

When fishermen co-manage marine protected areas: the case of Italy

Striped red mullet (Mullus surmuletus). The most economically important fish in the area because of its high market value - also the most caught. Image credit, Hans Hillewaert.A unique case study from Italy demonstrates how fishermen, scientists, and agency staff can co-manage marine protected areas to achieve both conservation and sustainable fishing.

In 2005, a portion of the 2227-hectare Torre Guaceto Marine Protected Area (MPA) off the Adriatic coast was opened up to fishing under an experimental co-management scheme.  For the prior five years the entire MPA had been managed as a strict no-take reserve. In the absence of fishing, the area had seen an increase in fish density and a regrowth in macroalgal beds from barrens overgrazed by sea urchins.

Under the new scheme, participating fishermen could fish one day per week in an 1885-hectare section using equipment specifically selected to minimize impacts to fish that prey on sea urchins. The experiment followed an adaptive management approach in which all parties could agree to modify fishing levels and practices based on monitoring data. The fishers, MPA managers, and the scientists met bi-monthly to discuss the progress with the experiment.

The researchers calculated project success based on the catch per unit of effort (CPUE) measured in quantity of fish caught per meter of net used. While CPUE decreased substantially from an average of 60 kg/km to 20 kg/km, it stabilized at that level - a rate twice as high as the average CPUE outside the reserve (9.6 kg/km and declining).  The authors write,

"Temporal trends in catch inside and outside the MPA provided two completely different pictures. After 3 years of co-managed exploitation, CPUE of all species and CPUE of the most common and valuable species within the MPA approached values approximately twice those obtained outside. In other situations in which an MPA was opened after full protection, in the absence of co-management, CPUE and fish densities decreased without stabilizing"

The researchers attribute the success in Torre Guaceto to the co-management approach, which incorporated the participating fishers' input into the decision making process. They state,

"According to our results, opening a sector of an MPA to benefit fisheries requires that the following be in place: effective enforcement; determination that fish density and size are increased before fishing can be resumed; and an adaptive co-management plan. Our results suggest that partial protection of coastal areas together with an adaptive co-management plan that involves fishers, scientists, and managers may benefit fishing communities and reduce overfishing"


--Reviewed by Rob Goldstein

GUIDETTI, P., & CLAUDET, J. (2009). Comanagement Practices Enhance Fisheries in Marine Protected Areas Conservation Biology DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01358.x

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.